Gas prices became relevant...

... when I started paying more than $30 to fill my compact 1994 Nissan Altima.

It's actually not much, but comparatively, it makes a big difference. And I don't have my parents paying for gas (or insurance, after the first 6-month payment) so I kind of keep track of these things. My heart literally skips a beat when I see that gas prices are continuing to rise dangerously. But I will stop driving before I fill my car with approximately 11 gallons of gas from the Artic National Wildlife Refuge.

From Reuters Business Channel:

Oil prices fell from a record peak on Tuesday as dealers took profits, but tensions in the Middle East and a flurry of refinery problems in the United States kept losses in check......

"By far the biggest jolt to the markets has come from the geopolitical front," said Edward Meir, an analyst at brokers Man Energy. "We think that the bigger source of tension is emanating from the Iranian situation," he added in a report.

Anybody else feel enslaved to the oil-rich countries and consequently entangled in their affairs?

Finally an adult who understands senioritis

Alexandra Starr in Slate:

You could conclude from these exams that American high-schoolers are ill-taught and ill-prepared for the competitive global economy. But what if you look at these tests like a capitalist rather than an educator? Nothing is at stake for kids when they take the international exams and the NAEP. Students don't even learn how they scored. And that probably affects their performance. American teenagers, in other words, may not be stupid. It could be that when they have nothing to gain (or lose), they're lazy.

The fact that 8-year-olds and 17-year-olds have different attitudes toward low-pressure exams isn't going to come as a surprise to anyone who has raised a teenager—or has been one. The NAEP is used to judge school systems and overall student performance, but the test doesn't matter at all to individual kids. In 2002 nearly half of the 17-year-olds tapped to take the national NAEP exam didn't bother to show up. Students who did show up left more essay questions than multiple-choice questions blank, an indication that they weren't going to be bothered to venture an answer if it required effort.

The "who cares?" phenomenon probably plagues older students' performance on international exams, too. Granted, kids in Japan and the United Kingdom don't pay a personal price for how they do on global tests, either. But cultural pressures can be very different in other countries. Korean schools have staged rallies to rev their children up before they take international assessments. And Germany created a national "PISA Day" to mark the date when 15-year-olds take the exam that will rank them against students in other countries. The U.S. Department of Education, meanwhile, has a hard time convincing principals to administer voluntary international tests at all.

And then she goes onto explain how on tests that matter- Exit Exam, SAT's- scores have been going up. I think her use of rising SAT scores is a bit sketchy because we all know College Board operates on a curve but we all get her general point. She's not exactly accusing us of being lazy. In fact, she understands our situation...

Put yourself in the shoes of these teenagers: After more than a decade of filling out multiple-choice bubbles where a lot is at stake, it is not surprising that some of them don't apply themselves on an exam that generally comes in the second half of their senior year—a test that has no bearing on which college will accept them, what kind of job they can land, or if they'll earn a high-school diploma. Face it: You'd probably be tempted to skip school that day—or, at the very least, leave a couple of the essay questions blank.

Our school administration had enough trouble getting JUNIORS to show up to standardized tests, and eventually they threatened to not let the kids sign up for their senior-year classes. You think if they made the seniors at Lynbrook take the STAR test, anyone would show up?